[aha] Expanded Box - Curatorial Statement
gadda1944
gadda1944 at libero.it
Sat Jan 31 16:13:05 CET 2009
Auguro al prezioso fiore di Domenico che matura sotto la neve ogni possibilità di vita e di maturazione. Quando esso sbocciasse, la soddisfazione di vederlo nascere varrebbe bene un po' di retorica e di ingenuità, che nessuno, se non qualche miserabile cinico, potrebbe rimproverargli.
Ho però i miei dubbi che quel fiore vedrà mai la vita, perché non vedo, fra i nutrimenti che gli vengono somministrati, il banale, volgare ma potente concime del rapporto con i movimenti che praticano la ribellione nella società, e non solo nell'arte. Richiamo scontato (credo) in una lista come questa, ma necessario visto che non ne trovo traccia nello scritto di Domenico. Le attività espressive dell'ultimo Novecento e oltre si nutrono (a mio modesto parere) tanto delle intuizioni e delle elaborazioni del gigante Duchamp quanto della conclusione dello stracitato (e poco meditato) saggio di Walter Benjamin sull'opera d'arte etc. etc., a cui va applicata naturalmente un po' di revisione terminologica:
"La sua [dell'umanità] autoestraniazione ha raggiunto un grado che le permette di vivere il proprio annientamento come un godimento estetico di prim'ordine. Questo è il senso dell'estetizzazione della politica che il fascismo persegue. Il comunismo gli risponde con la politicizzazione dell'arte."
gadda
---------- Initial Header -----------
>From : aha-bounces at ecn.org
To : "Aha net culture" aha at ecn.org
Cc :
Date : Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:13:34 +0100
Subject : [aha] Expanded Box - Curatorial Statement
> Expanded Box - Caring for an Expanded Conception of Art
> Domenico Quaranta
>
> [MORE INFOS AT: http://www.domenicoquaranta.net/ARCO2009.html]
>
> In the vast, variegated panorama of contemporary artistic
> experimentation there are various practices germinating that find it
> difficult to carve a niche for themselves in the official discourse
> and channels, despite the undeniable appeal they possess. The thing
> that makes them so precious, and as delicate as a flower growing under
> the snow, is not the fact that they use the "new media", because
> everyone uses the media - and now they are anything but new. What
> makes them so special is the fact that like the aforementioned flower,
> they contain a new strength, and a new promise. The strength is that
> of those who go about their lives without a thought for the rules that
> govern the world they live in, and who create the conditions that
> enable them to live, successfully, in a radically altered context; the
> promise regards this radical transformation.
>
> Everyone in the contemporary art field knows perfectly well that the
> context in which artists operate today was by and large established
> during the 20th century by Marcel Duchamp, and given structure and
> supported by a renewed museum and market system. According to this
> model, art no longer consists in the masterful implementation of a
> technique (painting, sculpture, music or writing) to present a world
> (the so-called "real" world, the unconscious world of the Surrealists,
> etc.). Anything can be art, if given a specific discourse and a
> specific conception, and if conveyed by means of a specific context.
> The aura of a work of art, which may be lost and found time and again,
> is now attributed by means of a precise process of consecration, which
> takes place on the market and in the museums. Without venturing into
> value judgements, it will suffice to consider the duration of this
> model to understand that what comes into being within it now is pure
> academicism. Murakami is to Duchamp and Warhol as Bouguerau is to
> Poussin and David. The gradual, unstoppable transition to the
> information society has radically challenged this model, nurtured in
> the bosom of the industrial society, but has not succeeded in
> destroying it altogether. It lives on as an act of faith, a consensual
> hallucination, a superstition boosted by the fear of what is to come.
> It survives, and continues to produce masterpieces, basking in the
> splendour which characterizes all periods of decadence.
>
> The new world is there, just round the corner - or, to return to the
> cutesy flower metaphor - under the snow. It is in the art that exists
> outside the confines of the art world, rejecting the "contextual
> definition" of Duchampian origin which seems to persist, as Joline
> Blais and Jon Ippolito wrote in their book At the Edge of Art, purely
> by inertia; it is in the art that seeks out public space, media space,
> biotechnology labs and the world of information, communications and e-
> commerce as its operative environment; it is in the art that draws on
> other practices and other specific fields of knowledge, to a point
> where at times it has problems seeing itself (and being seen) as art;
> it is in the art that enthusiastically embraces technological
> reproducibility, the variability of data and the fluidity of
> information, abandoning - and radically challenging - the status of
> precious fetish, and it is in the art that is open to interaction with
> the spectator, that forges and develops relationships, that breaks
> down the wall which interrupts and conditions our mental and physical
> dialogue with a work.
>
> This art exists, and it is at once strong and delicate, timid and
> aggressive, marginal and supreme. It is entrenched in the
> contradictions of all revolutions: it rebels against a world, but
> needs the cares of that world to resist. It has tried to escape, to
> open up new channels, but in the end it will succeed in changing our
> idea of art, defeating the academicism and opening the way to the
> future by means of dialogue and mediation. A future, which as the
> novelist William Gibson said, is already here, just badly distributed.
>
> The historic function of Expanded Box, the last embodiment of an
> enduring attention Arco devoted to new media and languages, is
> precisely that of cultivating and redistributing the future, and
> supporting an ?expanded? definition of art. In the last ten years, and
> through different programs, Arco has done exactly that, hosting and
> offering market opportunities to a growing number of galleries that
> take up this challenge, at their own risk. When you see this compact
> block of eight galleries that offer their space to monographic
> projects - often decidedly ambitious - you could be forgiven for
> thinking that Expanded Box is one of those typical cultural
> initiatives increasingly staged on occasion of contemporary art fairs,
> with the idea of accompanying the dialogue and exchanges between
> galleries and collectors, but without attempting to compete with them.
> This is not the case.
>
> Expanded Box, today, is the place where Leo Castelli would go to sell
> and Alfred H. Barr would go to buy. I am aware that this might sound
> rhetorical, and possibly a little ingenuous, but I cannot find a non-
> rhetorical way to say that there, more than anywhere else, the seeds
> of an evolution are germinating. They rest, well protected, in the
> machines of Lawrence Malstaf and the interactive environmental
> installations by Pors & Rao; in the sound installations by Manas and
> Moori and Thomson & Craighead; in the exploration of the dividing line
> between matter and the dematerialization of the media undertaken by
> the Korean Kim Jongku, and in John Gerrard´s 3D animations. They
> reproduce at the speed of a virus in the works of Joan Leandre, who
> upends the hyperreal interfaces that filter our rapport with reality,
> while they lurk in UBERMORGEN.COM´s media hacking activities, which
> uses low-tech tools to bring the giants of e-commerce to their knees.
>
> For ten years Expanded Box has invested in this new current, the
> novelty of which, we should reiterate, lies not so much in the media
> that these works use, but in the culture they reflect and in the idea
> of art that they open the way for.
>
>
> ---
>
> Domenico Quaranta
>
> mob. +39 340 2392478
> email. qrndnc at yahoo.it
> home. vicolo San Giorgio 18 - 25122 brescia (BS)
> web. http://www.domenicoquaranta.net/
>
> "Computers are incredibly fast, accurate and stupid. Human beings are
> incredibly slow, inaccurate and brilliant. Together they are powerful
> beyond imagination." Albert Einstein
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AHA mailing list
> AHA at ecn.org
> http://www.ecn.org/mailman/listinfo/aha
>
More information about the AHA
mailing list